Sie starrte mir direkt in die Augen. Dann drehte sich ihr Kopf um hundertachtzig Grad und wieder zurück und starrte mir direkt in die Augen. Da hat mich die Angst gepackt.
Heute bin ich nicht mehr bei den Eulen- ich meine bei den Strigiformes. Seit Dezember bin ich bei den Leporidae. Ich war schon immer ein Halbstarker -schon von Anfang an. Als junger Bursche (ich trug Blue Jeans, ein weisses T-Shirt und eine rote Lederjacke, genau wie James Dean, der König der Halbstarken) hatte ich ein frisiertes Töffli mit dem ich Dritt- und Viertklässler einkreiste, die sich auf dem Heimweg befanden. Ja, wegen mir kamen viele zu spät zum Essen.
Therese war eine Klasse über mir. (Wenn ich nicht die zweite Klasse hätte wiederholen müssen, wären wir zusammen zur Schule gegangen.) Sie hatte lange, struwwelige Haare und eine Pigmentstörung. Ich fand sie noch nett.
Therese arbeitet auch hier, sie hat Veterinärmedizin studiert. Früher, als wir noch Kinder waren, hat sie viel über Igel zu berichten gewusst: „Igel schmatzen“ oder „Igel tragen immer viele Zecken mit sich herum, weil sie halt so klein sind und sich, wie Zecken, in Gebüschen aufhalten“ hat sie oft gesagt. Wegen einer Dummheit bin ich im Gefängnis gelandet- für zwei Jahre. Therese hat damals gerade das Gymnasium beendet. Erkennen tut sie mich nicht, die Therese, wenn sie bei den Hasengehegen vorbeikommt. Sie ist, soviel ich weiss, nicht verheiratet.
Item, Tierpfleger ist ein solider Beruf- wie ich finde. Dort, wo ich zwei Jahre lang verbringen musste, hatte es auch Hasen. Ich war für deren Fütterung zuständig, und ich habe freiwillig deren Käfige geputzt. Als ich meine Strafe abgesessen hatte, durfte ich die Hasen mit nach Hause nehmen. Die Wärter versicherten mir, dass sich bis anhin niemand so liebevoll um sie gekümmert hat und dass sie bei mir sicher bestens aufgehoben wären. Ich weiss daher mehr über sie, also über Hasen im Allgemeinen, als zum Beispiel über den Kaiserschnurrbart-Tamarin. Meine Hasen, Therese und Jan, sind recht artig, so artig, dass sie ab und zu auf mein Sofa dürfen. Wenn es mir nicht gut geht, merken das die Hasen und kommen mich beschnuppern.
Nicht Hunde- nein! Hasen sind doch immer noch der beste Freund des Menschen.

Er strömte in die Gemächer ein,
wo Dorian Gray nur konnte sein.
Wie ein Adonis sass er da,
seine Schönheit war zu sehen-
von fern und nah.

Sein Antlitz liess alle Welt erblassen-
ach, ihr Rosen,
wie musstet ihr den Jüngling hassen!

Auf dem Diwan hockte er und wich-
erst beim letzten Pinselstrich,
den der Künstler hat getan-
mit viel Liebe und stillem Wahn.

Wie sehr er auch seine Blicke hat gewendet-
es gab nichts mehr zu tun,
sein Werk, das war vollendet.

„Komm her, Dorian, und sieh dich an!“,
war der Spruch, der aus des Künstlers Munde kam.

Der Jüngling gehorchte seinen Bitten-
und trat mit federleichten Schritten
vor das prächtige Werk heran,
denn sehen wollte er,
was des Künstlers Hände haben getan.

Ein dumpfer Schrei entsprang aus ihm,
als sein Blick das Bildnis fing-
denn dem Jüngling wurde klar,
wie schön sein junges Antlitz war!

Creating interesting characters is one thing, but integrating them in any particular surrounding can be very challenging because the character needs to be in proportion with the setting. (Provided that the illustrator wants this). Thus, Potter’s approach to depict familiar settings (house, garden, etc) might make this process easier and more effective.

Water colours are a transparent paint based on Gum arabic. Painting in water colour is a technique whereby the paint, thinned with water or as it is, is applied on special water colour paper. The paint has various constituents including pure pigments and Gum arabic, which ensures the pigments adhere to the paper. In contrast to gouache, water colours are always transparent.

– Talens

Water Colors come in tubes or in pans or half pans (this is the smaller size) The quality of the pigments is so remarkable, that very little paint is needed for filling even larger surfaces. Thus, in the last twenty years I never needed to get a refill for my half pans (and yes, I do make use of my watercolors) The only downside about this particular brand, that I can think of, is that it is rather expensive.

Unfortunately, when Nicolas and I moved to the States, we had to watch the weight of our luggage, and I had to leave my wooden box of exquisite watercolors behind – for the moment. In the meantime, I ordered a moderately priced Windsor & Newton Cotman Sketchers Pocket Box Set and am now working with twelve half pans instead of fifty, and two brushes. It is a decent set, but one definitely has to know how to mix colors in order to create more variety. In my opinion, having a larger palette to work with allows the artist to be somewhat lazy (I do not mean that in a derogatory way!) than if s/he paints with a smaller range of colors, because there is less mixing involved. A major downside of the Pocket Box Set is that it contains no black half pan. Instead, there is white – a color which is rather superfluous for this technique. Fate had it that in one line of the children’s poems, which I am currently illustrating, there appear mischievous gorillas which are, obviously, up to no good… It took me a while to mix a blackish tone for their coats: I mixed blues with browns, reds and greens. The result was not to my satisfaction (the coats just did not look dark enough), so, for the first time in this series, I tried a mixed technique; shading the coats with a black, extra soft oil base PITT Pastel Pencil by Faber Castell. I then dabbed the paint brush into some water and slightly smoothed away the noticeable pencil strokes. For a makeshift, the outcome of the gorillas’ coat is agreeable. However, it is slightly visible that an additional medium was used, which is why I will not apply this method again for this project. Apart from this, I have also changed the medium with which I normally draw the outlines of my subjects. Instead of a black fineliner, I now use a simple black ballpoint pen. The difference is obvious: While the fineliner looks “wet”, compact, and above all, very dark, the ballpoint pen is less thick and less dark, and the lines look “dry”. Nevertheless I prefer this medium because I can be more expressive with the lines, and I prefer the less compact look of the outlines. I will, therefore, continue to use it for my series (even though it is slightly irritating that this change in line structure is noticeable)

In conclusion, having to work with a different brand of watercolors when being in the middle of a project, proved to be less of a problem than was expected. It is hard to make a statement when, so far, I only produced one drawing with the different brand. However, I like to think that I noticed a difference in the pigmentation. Talen’s Rembrandt watercolors look slightly brighter, and are more transparent on the same paper than Windsor &Newton Cotman’s pigments. Then again, it is probable that I did not use the exact same range of colors, and therefore it is premature to make a final verdict.
Substituting a black pastel pencil for watercolors is, in my opinion, a good interim solution when one has to work with a limited palette, i.e., if the palette does not contain black, and if the painting/illustration is not part of a series of illustrations. (If it is, it might distract from the overall picture) Otherwise, it is best to buy the color separately (I am improvising and just ordered an ivory black half pan by Schmincke watercolors)

A good question and answer section about watercolors is in the bottom page of Blick art materials

The respective volume contains the stories, Five Little Pigs, A Murder is Announced, and Taken at the Flood. When reading these stories, I asked myself whether the “modern” reader has a lead over the “old” reader of Christie; because of the possible exposure to all those crime shows on TV (provided, they expose themselves to it). This might harden the modern reader and thus, make him or her foresee the plot. If so, does that mean that “modern” Christie readers cannot appreciate these stories the same way as the “old” reader might have appreciated them? Did readers back in the 40s and 50s have a different reading experience? Were they more scared to go to bed after poring over this sort of crime fiction? Were they more excited when Hercules Poirot or Miss Marple announced who the murderer was?

As far as the first premise is concerned, I do not think that increased exposure to crime fiction, or crime TV shows, etc., transform the reader into a super-sleuth who already gets it all. What I do think is that people who lived during the time when Christie novels were published, had a better understanding of the time in which the story unfolds; a better grasp of references made about people, places, politics, etc. It would be interesting to know, what people back then were taking in when reading Christie texts. I am a reader of Agatha Christie who has no idea what it was like to live during that time in which the story unfolds, but the author leaves me hints that I then can compare to now (e.g., references about clothing/textile, social relationships, money). What seems plausible is that these references which I, as the modern day reader, need, in order to make sense about the period, might have been read and meditated on differently in the past.

In conclusion, it seems that Agatha Christie’s strongest asset was to create stories that are timeless and appeal to a vast variety of readers. What I most like about Christie, is that she gave us Miss Marple and Hercules Poirot-two entirely different protagonists that are a consistent staff in her stories. When beginning to read her novels, one never knows who is going to appear -Poirot or Miss Marple (for they never solve crimes together), and that alone can be just as exciting as getting through the last pages.